Friday, August 3, 2012

Interview with Jorge Angel Livraga - Part 1


Interview given in 1987 to Delia Steinberg Guzman

DSG: Professor Livraga, I would like to begin by asking you what brought you to form New Acropolis - why and for what did you do it?

JAL: In order to answer, I will give a brief overview of my life, because the creation of New Acropolis was not a spontaneous action, nor the result of my will; it did not have a very definite objective.

I was born in a Catholic Italian family and spent the first five years of my life at the side of my paternal grandmother, who formed me in everything to do with life and religion with the simplicity of someone from a rural class, who, having arrive in Argentina, had moved up to the middle class, with a relatively low level of culture.

When I started going to school - in Argentina, the majority of schools are state-run, not private or religious -, things changed. And my father - an engineer, very interested in scientific advances - changed my ideas until I was converted into an evolutionist materialist who believed in an abstract, unknowable god. So what my grandmother had told me seemed to be fairy tales for uneducated people. This created a dichotomy for me: the uneducated people where those who had faith and the university-educated people were those who did not believe.

My father passed away when I was fifteen, and this left me very hurt and desolate. Although I was not lacking money, I felt alone, not knowing what to do, and I abandoned my studies. I went to a family property in the country and devoted myself to auto racing. I no longer believed in god or in anything. I abandoned any spiritual belief, the old teachings of my grandmother seemed ridiculous to me.

Once that phase had passed, I returned to Buenos Aires to take up my studies and begin university. I met a Mr. Smith, in theory by chance, since I only wanted to study languages; Smith had spent five years in Tibet and was acquainted with esotericists and alchemists, and was very interested in para-psychological phenomena. During the course of the English classes, and in order to demonstrate to me the notion of Maya (illusion in Sanskrit), perhaps using some form of hypnotism, he would place a pen on the table that would disappear between my hands when I reached out to pick it up. In this way, he taught me that things are illusory and that the senses are deceive us. He then quickly began to tell me about reincarnation, the laws of Dharma and karma...to my great surprise, all of these notions seemed as simple to understand as remembering something, and in a very short time, hours, in a few days, my life changed completely.

I sold my racing car, abandoned everything that I felt tied down to materially, and devoted myself to reading philosophical and esoteric works. I worked in the Theosophical Society and also in certain esoteric and spiritualist groups... My personal fortune allowed me to travel every time I heard of a medium or someone who could produce psychic phenomena, to see them and observe, and so I became familiar with all those questions.

Later, I began corresponding with Jinarajadasa and Sri Ram - both international presidents of the Theosophical Society - and decided to withdraw myself from the world. To this effect, I transformed the basement of my house into something similar to an Egyptian crypt in which I worked for nearly four years. During that time I also attended different faculties, Medicine, Philosophy, and Literature.

When I turned twenty-five, I left the crypt and on the counsel of the masters previously mentioned, I tried to form a group and publish a magazine aimed at young people. I got together with other university students who thought that the official curriculum could be complemented with subjects of a more esoteric nature. In searching for the sources, I studied Egyptian hieroglyphics and various forms of ancient languages, including cuneiform. I returned to my studies and the possibility of getting together with like-minded people to publish a magazine.

We printed the magazines ourselves; we sold it ourselves and put up advertisement posters. This brought more people and little by little, New Acropolis, without having planned it exactly, but rather following the advice of my masters and without a very definite idea of what would become New Acropolis; these ideas came later.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Courtesy


Let us begin by clarifying that the real ideological and etymological sense of the word "courtesy" comes from the old "Courts", places commonly used by philosophers, artists, writers, politicians, economists, judges, doctors and, in general, all professionals and distinguished people to whom it devolved to make the considerations and decisions in a State or Kingdom, in a congregation where, in the words of Plato, by their talents, knowledge and skills, they paid a public service to society; these were the ones who were in charge of the State, a word which in Latin became the "Res publica" (public concern), whence comes the word "Republic".


In all ancient cultures and civilizations that we know of, even partially, there was a "courteous" form of relations between people. In so-called the Middle Ages of the West, the customs of courtesy became configured in closed circles of communication between Ladies and Knights and among themselves, in training starting as Pages and culminating in Knighthood.

Unfortunately, with the passage of time, many of these healthy and useful traditions fell into disuse and even degeneration, promoting false and deceitful practices. This last image is the one that has come down to us at the level of mass media. And today, among the youthful generations, those who suffered the deformations of the post-war period, courtesy appears as a synonym for falsehood and inauthenticity.

We as philosophers want to rescue and generate forms of politeness that separate us from stupefying animality and the bestialisation of the purely instinctive.

Courtesy is both a form of generosity and love; a recognition of the universal brotherhood beyond all differences of class, ethnicity, gender, nationality, social and economic states. It is a humble but pleasant way to apply our First Principle:

Bringing men and women of all faiths, races and social conditions around an ideal of universal brotherhood.

Just as when we make a gift, however poor it may be, we usually cover it with papers and colored ribbons, so that before reaching the object itself, the recipient has the feeling that we thought about them affectionately and we have taken care to express our feelings of affection and good wishes to them; every word or action must be prudently wrapped in our ability to give and love.

Developing polite manners does not make someone less of a man or a woman. On the contrary, the most effective and enjoyable gentlemen or ladies are the ones that put a bit of beauty, love and courtesy in all they do. They greet with a handshake, hug or kiss according to the circumstances and actors; and by "actor" we must understand what the Emperor Augustus understood: active and effective participants in life ... someone who does something. The real "Actor," according to the Mystery Dramas, is someone who represents things; someone who presents them again, but now with a level of human interpretation that enhances, beautifies and ennobles, so that everyone can participate.

We should strive to avoid any gesture of anger and bitterness, hatred or rancor. This attitude, although it begins by being merely external, if sustained with fortitude and perseverance, gets to sink in deeper and, like the clown in fairy tales, by both smiling and making people laugh, his joy ends up rubbing off on himself and he finds consolation for the misfortunes of life.

There are many political and religious "ideologies" that have caused genocides and have made many people mourn. Let us do the opposite, let us bring joy, peace, harmony, prosperity. A philosopher who is saddened by banal circumstances is not a true philosopher, and even less if  they appear so and go sharing their pains to all their friends, showing signs of spiritual weakness, and parasitic helplessness.

Become accustomed to giving rather than asking.

Let us not judge others in the dim light of our newly growing insight, abundantly warped by our passions. Let us be strong and upright. In the world there are too many beggars ... Do not be one of them.

I refer not only to the economic activity, but also globally. Let us give with overflowing hands! Our energy, our kindness and goodwill to all. Let us work hard. Let us study, think and pray as needed ... but above all things, let us break our molds of selfishness, with Humility of Heart, which is not that of the body and rags. Let us be Courteous ... Let us really and every day make a new and better world ... and live in it.

Friday, May 11, 2012

Mental Forms and How to Control Them


The popularization of esotericism (a fallacy; the esoteric, by simplifying it and sharing it with insufficiently experienced people, ends up becoming ‘’exoteric’’; real Esotericism is never divulged to the hoi polloi) has created many concepts and opinions that are clearly deformed and lacking in a solid foundation which, in the long run, only benefits historical materialism and skepticism and produces a growing number of people psychologically and physically wrecked by the ‘’aficionados’’ of the so-called occult sciences. That is why we are going to clear up some fundamental points for a purely prophylactic purpose.

A Form is Always Mental

The form is not the matter that reflects, contains or expresses it. Place a magnet under a piece of paper and on top of it flakes of iron, and we see that these particles take the form of the magnetic currents generated by the magnet. The form of the waves does not come from the matter, but rather from the invisible magnetic orientation that the magnet generates. Thus the material form always corresponds to an already existing form in the subtle energetic planes. The subtlest variety of energetic forms that we know of is the mental form, therefore the form of the magnet was conceived, and its magnetism responds to a modality of the cosmic mind, adapted by the human mind under the appearance of the magnet. The human mind is only a ‘’crystallization’’ of the cosmic mind in which is inserted its will to be: what the Indians call Manas Taijasi.

Consequently, the material form is always impermanent and perishable; it lives as long as the mental form that animates it.

A Mental Form Has Great Force

Given the plasticity of the subtle planes, an Idea-Form has a great effectiveness, since it adapts itself as a being to imbed itself in the substance of the phenomenal world which is the one that we commonly perceive. A mental form properly expressed and nourished, inexorably produces changes in the material sphere, which is always being carried by it, since the material phase has no form or will outside of its own existence.

That is how the currents of opinion, fashions, and propagandas gain momentum. They are simple mental forms guided to work on the material plane after having experienced its power over the listless minds of massified people. The so-called ‘’fashionistas’’ are nothing but victims of these currents duly supported by the robotization of the material forms, pre-programmed by mental forms. The colors, the sounds and music, the attitudes, the lifestyles constitute the “morals” of the moment, that is, the “custom” that governs the masses. In the fight between mental forms, the most organized and strongest impose themselves, and it builds reinforcements for its own forms with the remains of the departed forms.

A Mental Form has Great Strength but is not Invincible.

We have seen, in broad lines, the power of a mental form. Can we overcome it?

Yes; with another mental form of an opposite nature and of greater force, above all spiritual, since the acts and volitions expressed in the more subtle planes have priority over the less subtle, which are slower and more fragile, due to their own ‘’vitrification.’’ An idea-form motivated by the spirit and well-conceived by a strong mind, can overcome the idea-form of the vicious and everything related to the unstable psychophysical world. Every man, every woman in their spiritual heart have the necessary strength to conceive and emit mental forms. The general weakness of the emissions is due to the ignorance of the technique and the doubts, which the current deficient education has put in people’s souls, which inculcates fragility, doubts, and capriciousness. But minds disciplined by strength, will power, the absence of vices and circular ideas that consume energy without leaving their orbit, offer interesting opportunities to overcome all forms of adversity, transmuting them into positive experience and successful acts. Remember that a mental form can only be overcome by another mental form. Physical discipline, hygiene, songs, beautiful scenery, altruistic sentiments are invaluable auxiliaries for the fight against bad mental forms. Oration and work, a heroic sentiment of generosity towards others, and proper human dignity are helpful.

How can a mental form be definitely mastered?

First of all, by mastering it within ourselves.

Those who do not control themselves will never be able to control their surroundings, because if we analyze it, our first surroundings are made up of our own vehicles of consciousness, being the passional, vital and physical.

Someone who in more or less normal circumstances cannot get out of bed in the morning despite firmly wishing to, should not dream of raising ideologies, nor having followers, other than fools. Only those who can face themselves and face adversity and badness are the only ones who can overcome those circumstances. Those who do not do so and are infested with the invisible insects of mental corruption are walking dead and soon physical death will follow without ever having left their mark on the world.

Having fulfilled then, the first phase, the following consists in putting into practice in a systematic way, without fail and interruptions. We know that many students viscerally hate all form of discipline but this refusal has been artificially provoked by obscure interests whose ‘’straw dogs’’ are the materialists of whatever kind or the pseudo-spiritualists of exotic anarchies entrapped by their own magnetic or biological clock, that bestializes them.

It is fundamental not to ‘’rest on one’s laurels’’, because the harmful mental form may have only been chased away and not transmuted. If we consider the plasticity of the mental forms, we will see that it is difficult to be certain that we have left them behind. This certainty will be given by the changes that occur in the life of the person that has made the effort. If the person is physically, vitally, psychically, and mentally cleaner and purer, then the person has triumphed. If this does not occur, but the previous bad habits have been replaced by drugs and fanatical obsessions, then the old negative mental form survives, with a different appearance.

A pure environment, healthy company, right livelihood, avoiding “shysters” that give “initiations” in summer retreats; working and studying actively, are the healthiest preventatives. Do not give sexuality more importance than it has. Cultivate love, generosity, arts, letters, and sciences. Avoid excesses in eating, drinking and smoking. Set aside every day, at the end of the day, for a short but productive analysis of conscience. Believe, not because of custom, but by inner conviction, in God and the immortality of the Soul. Chase away evil to where it came from. Always give preference to music and spiritual environments over unbridled orgies. All of these create a sure vital disposition that safeguards us from falling into the grasp of mental forms that are foreign to us.

If people live the way described above, they will transmute themselves slowly, but inexorably. They will live a New Era, full of happiness, rich in nuances, full of possibilities, of triumph in all planes. Our concept of “Acropolis” or “High City” is nothing more than to make a better society with better individuals. For these people are not affected by passing mental forms and are not carried away by catastrophists. They know that the Will, carrying new, young and powerful mental forms, conquers all. In a certain way, neither death exists for these beings since they have joined with the one-life, that which never dies. It renews itself, along with the very march of Nature, but never stops.

A new Clock marks for them only happy hours; they are walking with the new era.

September 1980

Monday, July 18, 2011

Demographic growth

It is impossible to broach this subject without thinking of Malthus who, in 1798 wrote: ‘the increase of population is necessarily limited by the means of subsistence’’. As always, this visionary had to endure the most acerbic criticisms, which turned to ridicule when the industrial development of the 19th Century, the exploitation of the great reserves in new countries and the technical advances in the transport and preservation of food painted a bright future or at least much more favorable than outlined by the so-called ‘Malthusians’.


But the statistics of the ‘Belle Époque’ where imbued with a certain romanticism and therefore not totally scientific, and their prognostics were based purely and exclusively on European Society, assuming that the rest of the world would come to function as an immense field of production of primary resources for the benefit of western civilization. As the XXth century advanced, the outlook got darker and darker, and Malthus was referred to with more respect and fear.

The advances in preventive medicine, geriatrics and child care, the natural balance damaged the natural equilibrium and the child and elderly populations have grown proportionately, while adults have been reducing their work hours as their tasks have become easier. A veritable demographic explosion took place in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, tripling the world population in a century.

It is to be understood that the same proportion of the active population did not increase, but rather the passive part increased catastrophically. Moreover, the greatest levels of reproduction occurred precisely in human groups with the least amount of buying power and the problem of hunger made itself felt in an alarming way.

Countries of Asia, Africa, and America that before the Second World War, were exporting some 11 millions tons of grain, later needed to import 25 million tons annually. This gave a worldwide dimension to the problem.

Experiments launched by Special Departments of the United Nations, showed that, in Africa and Asia, around 1950, increasing agricultural technology and exploiting non-traditional resources did not solve the problem. It was seen that the population used the better living conditions to ‘’explode’’ demographically, so that those experimental zones were turned into nightmares and must today resort to, for their maintenance, exhausting work regimens, importations of ‘donations’, and having to support levels of poverty worse than have been recorded since Neolithic times.

Historical Antecedents

We have asked ourselves if this is the first time that humanity has encountered this problem, in order to try to draw upon antecedents that could bring us a valid experience for our times.

Our investigation hits the practically insurmountable wall of evidence that what we call ‘history’ is barely a minuscule part of the past, and not of all of mankind, but rather of the Mediterranean basin, and of various more or less isolated and half-known areas. The oldest treatises’ that we have are of Hindu and Chinese origin which are too adulterated, or of which only miserable fragments remain. And among the latter, none specifically deal with what we understand by ‘history’, nor are they ‘chronological’ at least for the modern researcher.

In the Hindu ‘Puranas’, there is an account that is perhaps relevant, being the reference to past humanities or cycles of civilization that had existed before ours, and were apparently destroyed by horrible cataclysms, by natural means and by means caused by man, through the use of uncanny processes that they extracted from certain metals, with destructive results.

It can therefore be said that mankind never perishes, but in a more or less cruel way, manages to reduce its possibilities for survival. Moreover, in reality, those proto-historical texts which are obscure and conceived for a mentality that no longer exists, help us very little, and that which is clear to us is that, even if it really isn’t, the problem seems new to us and its solution should be conceived without delay.

Many Possibilities

Unfortunately the problem of demographic explosion is so serious and pressing, that it has surpassed at least for the time being, mankind’s capacity for reacting, and the confusion has encouraged the most unrealistic proposals. From these, we will select a few, pointing out the difficulties.

A) Let the rich countries help the most poor. Impractical, because where do these great powers get their riches if not from their advantageous trade with the rest of the world? This would then create a closed circle in which the poor would get more and more poor and moreover, would slowly go into debt, losing at the same time strength and autonomy. The Latin Americans, for example, know through sad experience that ‘’cheap is expensive’’.

B) Encourage the production of food in laboratories and marine resources. Impractical, since the costs are enormous and there is no time to make them affordable for them to be effective. Moreover, the last to benefit would be precisely the poor countries that would be incapable of setting up such industries.

C) A redistribution of the world population since it is known, for example, that in America and Africa there are enormous areas of uncultivated land. This could be accomplished, but would require a change in mentality difficult to achieve without deep changes in political, social, and economic conceptions. Without a world government, this does not appear feasible in the next decades.

D) Explore the cosmos in search of more living space. Impractical, because aeronautical technique is still in its infancy, and when it becomes possible to accomplish these migrations, millions of people will have died, and the problem will have been overcome with the most painful methods.

E) Incite a greater collective consciousness with the goal of spontaneously regulating births. Utopic, those who are reproducing do not have that conscience, and it would take centuries to develop it .

The Solution

The exercise of philosophy predisposes us to the resolution of problems and to handle new situations. The search for Essences creates the ineffable habit of postponing personal interests and useless concepts, for the benefit of a solution that is at once practical and moral.

Walking without carrying the weight of old dogmas, nor carrying the full bags of the stones of dialectic materialism, placing one’s sight forward and upward and not to the left and the right, allows anyone to recover the now least common of the senses; paradoxically, common sense.

Therefore we do not see the solution in any of the plans previously put forward, but rather a learned combination of them all, with the scientific input of the specialist in demographics, which they have, and which is good, but are confounded by political and religious interests.

If the demographic explosion is a bad thing, we need to consider it like the measles or the bubonic plague, in a way that would be necessary to develop vaccines and inoculate all of those at risk.

In the case that concerns us, let there be a scientific control of births, managed by doctors and specialists, without prior opinion polls or debates in the more or less inoperative parliaments. While the theorists, moralists, representatives and deputies discuss in comfortable niches, millions of children continue to be born deformed, and condemned to misery and premature death.

This issue is too important to be playing around as we do concerning human dilemmas.

We need to act. Specifically, applying a form of periodical control that regulates a limited amount of predetermined births according to the conditions of each region, and at the same time, implement through all channels the increase of production and the collective awareness of the problem.

If these emergency methods give results, there will be time to decrease them.

Before the customary voices that clamor for the ‘’right to live’’ we oppose not reasons, but the palpable reality of millions of hungry people, whom our indolent attitude denies them the right to live.

To those who invoke religious motives, we ask that, like the master of Nazareth, they multiply bread and fish RIGHT NOW. If they cannot do so, they should stop judging science.

To the ambitious ‘nationalists’, who think that their countries would be more powerful if they had a greater population, we remind them that we are in the ‘atomic age’, and that today an army of a million men is in the hands of small groups of technicians that control a few missiles with nuclear heads.

There is no justification to prolong this agony of so many human beings, nor to promote the genocide of millions in the coming years. If we do not dare to solve this problem, if we do not have a HEART that cares for those disinherited children of Asia, Africa, and America, having conquered the moon, will be of little value, and we will never have the moral right to call ourselves HUMANS.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

'Every man and every woman not only need to have clothes, food, and in the best of cases, a car, but also something which is more important: we need to have, you might say, a bit of dignity, a handful of glory. But today’s world and the crisis in force are tearing away that little handful of dignity and glory. Sometimes it doesn’t matter whether we are well dressed, nor eat like princes; but it is important to be happy with ourselves and to have that little bit of glory, that handful of inner satisfaction that is the only one that will allow us to assimilate the food that we have in our mouths, the thoughts that we have in our head, the emotions that we have in our heart. It is really urgent to know ourselves.'

from 'How and Where to Know Ourselves' , par. 16

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Prophecies for the year 2000, part 2

There will be comparative studies done of not only the current great religions, bit also of the religions of the past. Today, no one, if they have a university education and a certain level of understanding and study, can say that the ancient religions were dictated by the devil. Nonetheless, a hundred years ago, this was accepted.

Today we can no longer accept that. We can no longer accept in any way that the great Greek philosophers, like a Socrates or a Plato, were influenced by a kind of animal with big horns, a tail and hoofs, who whispered to them the principles of The Republic or the principles of Being and Existing. We can no longer conceive of an Aristotle that was possessed by demons just before expounding on his Dialectics.

Today we recognize, everyone recognizes, those of us who say so and those of us who don’t, that from the most remote antiquity there were enlightened men, men who thought, men who could delve into the important questions. And the comparative study of these men, between their thought, between their works, will give us a renewed strength, a new impulse and new optimism. Because if within those fraternities and small groups, men who lived and taught emerged, why can’t we do it today? Today they can emerge as well.

The study of the Chivalric Orders of the Middle Ages, for example, is going to become more and more important and meaningful. Up until now, what has been shown of the Middle Ages, especially to the children, is what? Well, that there would be a man holding a very big stick, like a staff, and another man holding a very big stick, like a staff, and they would meet on a bridge. They would then throw themselves into a head on collision and fracture each others skulls. This is more or less what the average person thinks of the Middle Ages. There’s also a lady who always wears this large hat, always peering out of a castle, waiting for a knight that will never arrive.

It is obvious that all of this no longer satisfies us and that the Middle Ages have a different message, a different force. The Orders of Chivalry were something more than two imbeciles breaking each others’ heads at a crossroad. We are beginning to realize that a series of veils have been placed over those elements. In order to see or in order to bear the present, the past has been smeared. The newer research will however will make the humanity that will reach the year 2000 realize and perceive the importance of the olds forms of culture and what can be extracted from them.

Today, the Martial Arts of the Ancient Orient are being studied. Do you think that one hundred years ago , in 1875, somebody in a university chair, in a public place, among the civilized people or Europe, would think that it was necessary to study the codes of Japanese or Chinese Martial Arts? No, on the contrary, this would have been a total aberration. Yet today we are studying them.

Today we recognize that beyond the modern forms such as Japanese Jiu Jitsu, there were very ancient schools that used to train monastic knights in the Far East. And today, there are thousands and thousands of young people who practice these principles, some in a better way than others. And many youths have been helped by these, because these teachings, despite that which the sensationalist movies want to show us with individuals who throw big punches at each other and with the exploits of 007 and 007 and a half who are fighting, today’s youngsters sometimes find in the simple salutation before a tatami, a mysticism that they may not find elsewhere. It’s certain that through the control of their own body, they are trying to assert themselves in a society that does not give them strength and that, in a way, has left them alone.

We will also have to review, in this progression towards the year 2000, our political forms, Many political forms have already been tried, and none of them has been found completely satisfactory; and I’m not saying completely satisfying for everybody, because we will never all be satisfied. It’s like this lecture or talk. Some will say that I didn’t speak well, others will say that I spoke even worse, and others will ask how come I didn’t talk about other subjects. Which means that you won’t agree with each other. In politics, it is the same. Everybody can’t agree with a specific form of government; everybody can’t agree on a specific form of policy; but everybody will agree about the fact that it is necessary to deeply investigate all forms because they have not generated what they could give or what they promised to give.

This deep investigation of politics will lead to a conversion of politics into a Science of Politics, where the one who is in politics holds a Doctorate in Politics, like today where someone who practices medicine holds a Doctorate in medicine; the same with engineering, etc. Which means that Politics will have to abandon, let’s say its primitive and pre-scientific stage of improvisation, so that the ones who talk about politics can be the ones who have studied and know what has been going on up to now, and who have knowledge and capacities, because of their serious preparation; in the same way as the ones who speak of medicine or engineering have necessarily studied and gone through a preparation in Medicine or Engineering.

Perhaps then the politicians will stop fighting with each other. Why is there fighting among Politicians? Because there is no Science. In the same way, doctors used to fight in the stage of pre-scientific medicine, when they were saying that such disease was cured with toad saliva, whereas others said that it was healed with iguana saliva. And such was the fighting between doctors.

Today there are some basic, elementary medicines recognized by all and that are used by all doctors. When Politics gets to this scientific stage where things become clear and stop being opinions and start to become judgments, then this perpetual political race will end. Politics will be converted into the “Art of the Just conduct of the people”.

We are also going to encounter a new expression of Art; that’s to say we’ll find a new expression for Art that will try to transmit a message to people. The era of improvisation will also disappear little by little in the field of Art by the year 2000. This era of confusion when for instance, it doesn’t matter if a frame is set upside down; this will also fade away. Today, sometimes we don’t know if a frame is set upside down or not, because it only represents a formless mixture impossible to decipher. The forms of snobbery will also disappear in the face of a tighter and more open society; a society where gossip will have less importance.

In the face of this new Society, pseudo-artistic forms won’t survive. Today, when we attend an art, music, or painting event what happens? Well, sometimes while looking at a painting, trying to be like everyone else, we wonder “and this, what is it?” but of course trying not to let our bewilderment show on our face! We can see quite often, when we go to the movies or to one of those documentary films, the man hosting the film saying “And here, we can see the wonderful artwork of the painter Don Juan de los Palotes. Look how magnificent it is! And you see six stripes and a big spot. With this he wanted to represent “The Battle of Teruel”. And then everybody saying “Hum, very nice indeed…” But all we see is a big patch and it seems that we are the dumbest person in the world, who doesn’t understand a thing about painting. It is the same thing when, in a concert hall, we are presented avant-garde music that the specialized magazines have glorified, wherein a man gives a few strokes on the keyboard of a piano and the piece’s title is “Variations on a theme from Mozart”.

We are surprised about the general public opinion that considers that such painting, such sculpture or such piece of music conveys a great richness, an artistic message, when in reality, it is only a confused, deformed and sick reflection of a mind that is also sick and contaminated. Yet, everybody seems to agree that this is Art. Therefore, we often ask ourselves whether it’s because we were born so dumb, so stupid or because we picked up a hereditary flaw from a great grandfather, considering that faced with such music, such painting, such politics, we don’t understand anything.

This feeling of rejection that we are made to feel propels us towards a year 2000 where we can strive to live better. And such demanding and seeking of professionalism, such seeking of reliability, authenticity and truth, because we are tired of hearing lies, lies of all kinds; and because we want things to be clear and straight; this will bring a feeling of human fraternity; but a human fraternity that is real and not a human fraternity that is made up, that exists only in lightly spoken words, when for instance we say “I never forget my donation for the poor children of Africa!”. And then, later on, while we are eating a sandwich, drinking a glass of wine, reading in the newspaper “56,000 people starving in India! Imagine that, those poor people!”, and then we keep on eating our sandwich.

This means that in reality, our fraternity is not a fraternity of heart, but something simply theoretical. We talk of fraternity between men of different worlds, of course, but we don’t talk about fraternity with our janitor, we don’t talk of fraternity with our own brother, we don’t talk of fraternity with our friends.

The fraternity we need, the fraternity that would form the basis of the art of living together for the year 2000, is not a theoretical fraternity applied on abstract masses but a real living fraternity. It is Concord. The fraternity between a man and another man, between a woman and another woman, between a man and a woman. More then anything we need to learn to be good to our dog before being good to the Martians.

We need to learn to live with ourselves, to tolerate our own faults, to admire our greatness’, to put up with our pettiness’, to speed up our slowness’, to elevate all that is valuable within us, as an inner construction.

We need to accomplish a great inner work; that great inner work which is the great liberation of man.

That’s why New Acropolis proposes, for this launch towards the year 2000, the recreation of a new humanism. It proposes the formation of cores of Philosophical Fraternities where Men can meet each other, look at each other in the eyes and do what they think, with no violence, no fear, with the authenticity to say this, to think that; to have the courage to assert and proclaim our own convictions.

New Acropolis proposes the comparative study of Religions, Sciences, and Arts in order to arrive at the real understanding of that which underlies all of these things. Because we are getting tired of the superficiality. Because we can’t live on varnishes. Because we want to breath and drink air and water that is purer and deeper.

New Acropolis proposes the investigation of the unexplored laws of Nature and of the inner Man. That’s to say the knowledge of where I come from, who I am and where I am going. But without being told; I must see it for myself; to be able to somehow live it; I must feel something, experience it, feel it and live it even though I can’t explain it to myself in a rational way. I have to feel, like I feel when touching a column and say “Here, there is a column”. And not something rationalized, something Byzantine like saying for instance “Could it be possible, dear friends, that a column exists at this place? Let’s see, who believes so and who doesn’t agree?” In this world of opinions, we are all going crazy. We can no longer unite through the lower dimension; we need to do it like columns that unite together in the heights where their capitals bloom; there , in the highest part. The multiple and vain opinions are of no use to us; what we need is to put the hands of the body on corporeal things, and the hands of the soul on things of the soul. That’s to say to arrive at the perception, the direct contact, to face these fundamental truths. And then will come a year 2000 that won’t be only new, but that will also be better.

What we propose in this pyramid of evolution in which we live, is to scale our own side of the pyramid, always trying to go upwards and ahead; always trying to go to the highest part and not to the lowest; trying not to poison Nature, trying not to ruin the souls of other people, trying not to exploit the weak, trying not to hurt the ones who live around us.

We want to reach the year 2000 trying to build a New Acropolis, a new High City that does not cut us from the Past, that does not cut us from the Future. A High City that gives us the possibility to leave this stifling present; that allows us to feel that behind us there is something, that our past is noble, that we have not descended from a race of apes neither from decadent or degenerated beings, but that we have descended from men who sought the stars like we do and that ahead of us, there are generations who will know how also seek the valid aspects of Life and Death; generations who are going to investigate, who are going to try to encounter God in every way and who will try to encounter themselves.

From there, what we see for the year 2000, is not only a World that is New but also a World that is Better, and This, will be the result of the work of each of us. May no one say “I can’t”. We all can; in one way or another; at one level or another; in society or in an individual way, we can all say “I can do what I want, what my Will dictates to me”. That’s to say that we all can, in a certain way, meet ourselves. To do whatever little good action a day or a week; investigate what we want to know; enter into contact with the people we want to know.

We can already be living this year 2000, because I say to you that we are all contemporaneous, but we don’t live the same Time. That’s to say we all live in the same year, but mentally, we don’t live the same psychological year. If we can make this effort of consciousness; if we can reject the varnishes I was speaking of earlier; if we can deepen and reach the vein in the wood of History; if we can remove form the surface of the water the impurities that fell in and darkened it and mange to drink the deep, clear waters, then we are already living in the year 2000! We can all manage to live this year 2000, psychologically, fraternally, even if we should die tomorrow.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Prophecies for the year 2000, part1

First of all, I would like to clarify that, for those who are very young, who will live to see the year 2000, who will be able to live in that New and Different World, and for those of us who are not so young and might not live to see it but are nevertheless interested because of our children, our disciples, our loved ones or for the work we leave behind, I would like to clarify for everyone before anything that we have chosen the year two thousand as a point of reference. I do not believe that in the year two thousand, something different is going to happen; because the year two thousand is according to the Christian chronology. If we took the Muslim chronology, for example, we would have to deduct six centuries; if we used the Hebrew chronology, we would have to add several millennium; and if we used the Buddhist chronology we would have to add on another half a millennium, etc. To say that we are in this or that year is basically a chronological arrangement that is determined amongst groups of people and does not really contain any form of dramatic prophecy as is generally seen in those prophecies that announce “the end of the world”.

Everyone knows that around the year 1000, a lot of prophecies were given; there were people who committed suicide or left all their belongings to the Church or to their friends, thinking that some strange comet will come and blow up the Earth, or that some wicked angel will exterminate everyone on the planet.

It is that feeling of fear, of terror, that we must rid ourselves of. It’s true that we are in a kind of “turning point in History”, but this turning point will not arrive as punctually as when we say that in a certain year or on a certain date such and such thing will happen. The premonition of the end of the world or the destruction of humanity is an almost infantile terror that is found in the collective subconscious.

It is obvious that humanity is very old. Archaeological and historical investigations show us that an advanced and civilized humanity, a humanity who thinks - perhaps not the technological mankind that we know, but yes, a mankind who manipulates basic tools, a mankind who loves, who suffers and who dies, has existed for millions of years and will very probably continue to exist for millions more.

We may ask ourselves, nonetheless, what will humanity of the year 2000 be like? First of all, it’s important to understand that History, the course of History, like all things, is cyclical; and the study of History, like all things, teaches us that mankind is part of Nature.

It has been demonstrated that Space is circular. Everyone knows the laws of Einstein that state that not only is Space circular but that Time is also. Everything develops in a circular form. We know that the constellations travel on circular paths; that the Earth, the planets, etc., also function under that law, by the law of eternal return.

Therefore, to project the present time into the future time of the year two thousand would be a mistake; a mistake equivalent to what a futurologist of fifty or sixty years ago, who thought that in 1975, the world would be a projection of what had developed in the preceding century. However things did not happen like that ; great changes occurred.

The person in the year 1000 who tried to visualize what the year 2000 would be like, would have thought that maybe in the year 2000 or in this year, 1975, in many respects, it would be the same, we would all be engaged in a pilgrimage. For the Muslims it would be to the Mecca, for the Christians to the Holy Land, etc. However today, fortunately or unfortunately, nobody is very preoccupied about going on a pilgrimage to the Mecca or to the Holy Land. Today, interests are different; because the interest’s of every age are completely different .

People living in the year 2000 will have interests, will have inclinations completely different from ours as well.

Let’s analyze the possibilities, let’s analyze the trajectories in order to see what we can say about that period that we have fixed at the year 2000 and in what manner we can be part of that current of History.

It’s obvious, for example, that there are a series of studies currently being done in various fields that are going beyond what we could call official science. Everyone knows that official science is muddled in a certain inertia. If mankind would had followed official science (I will give a give a few examples) perhaps Columbus’ ships would not have arrived in America. Because according to the official science of the day, America did not exist and according to the official science of the day, the Earth was not round.

And if we would have left things to official science, we would not have airplanes either, because the universities of the last century maintained and “scientifically” demonstrated that objects heavier than air could not fly; only objects lighter than air could. We would not be able to split atoms either; nor would we be able to communicate over distances by radio and telephone, because official science has, in general, always opposed these innovations; it has always maintained a kind of inertia that looks more towards the past than towards the future.
There are investigations being carried out today that official science practically ignores. Let’s look at some of them, such as the problem of Parapsychology, for example.

The word parapsychology itself doesn’t mean anything, since as you know, it means “that which is beyond Psychology”. And how can we study something that we can’t even define? If you asked me “What is behind this door?” and I were to answer “Ah! What is on the other side of this door is that which is beyond the door”. In reality, that wouldn’t explain anything. But if I where to say that behind the door, there’s my office, there’s a desk, an electric typewriter, a filing cabinet, etc., then you would have an idea of what is behind the door; whereas by saying that what is behind the door is that which is behind the door, I wouldn’t be saying anything.

In the same manner, Parapsychology deals with things that are beyond common psychological phenomena, but an in-depth investigation of this phenomena has not been developed. There has been more development in the investigation of the tricks that could be done to fake this phenomena and therefore prove that this phenomena is not real. Which means that we go back to the same mentality as when it was denied that the Earth was round; there was the attempt to deny the rotundity of the Earth based on speculations. And it is the same with this.

There are a number of investigations and observations pertaining to the fact that there is more than what we understand to be simple Psychology; there are miles of archives that record cases of telepathic communication between two people; of people who have lifted themselves from the ground by way of a phenomenon called levitation; people that accomplish very strange phenomena, such as Mr. Uri Geller, who bent spoons or adjusted watches from a television stage, etc. Some say that they really occurred, others say that they were faked. Nevertheless, there is no serious study, and the studies that depend on testimonies do not arrive at an agreement as to the conclusions, which demonstrates a lack of scientific method. Because if I tell you that water is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, we all agree, no one will come and say “No, it’s three parts hydrogen”, and someone else who would say “actually, water is made up of chlorine” or “it’s really made of fluoride…” Why? Because we have arrived at an agreement that two parts hydrogen with one part oxygen forms water, that is, we have arrived at an observation; the composition of water has become what we can call a “scientific truth”.

But in regards to Parapsychology, we have not arrived at a scientific truth. There evidently exists curative methods by way of forces that some call spiritual while others call them psychological or magnetic forces. Nevertheless, today , even among doctors, some make use of simple hypnosis while others do not. Some say that hypnosis comes from the use of will power, that is to say, from an animic force that is transmitted through the human organism to achieve the power of suggestion over another person; and others say that hypnosis is simply a sort of state of manipulation of a person being faced with someone who stares them in the eyes or moves something shiny in front of them.

It is obvious that in the years to come, towards the year 2000, the study of Parapsychology will be done more seriously. It is useless to place barriers in front of things that are evident.
It cannot be guaranteed, even though we know little about flying saucers, that something, from somewhere, does not exist, because there are testimonies regarding this. To be sure, they could be machines, they could be natural phenomena or secret weapons from Russia or North America, or atmospheric reflections of an unknown type; they could be natural micro-satellites that penetrate within our atmosphere, or the so-called St-Elmo’s fire, etc. Many theories exist, but in reality, something of the sort exists and that is what people see.

Science will also open up to these fields, that is, the field of knowledge of things that today are not official. In various institutions, chairs, institutes, laboratories will be created that will, in a serious manner, investigate that outer nature that we ignore as well as that inner nature which we also ignore.

Despite all the archaeological investigations that have been done and that have demonstrated that it is absolutely impossible that during antiquity, with a simple system of pulling with rope, huge rocks, like the great ruins of Egypt for example, could have been moved; yet official science continues to affirm this. Official science continues to maintain that the great masses of stones that can be seen at Tiahuanaco or at Machu Picchu have been transported, let us say “miraculously”, always pulled with a rope, because if it wasn’t otherwise it wouldn’t be considered scientific, across half of the Andes mountains. This statement is completely harebrained and yet regardless, they continue and continue to maintain it…

It is still maintained, for example, that to build the Pyramid of Keops, huge masses were lifted to a height of more than 145 meters, with a ramp. Besides the fact that the remains of this ramp were never discovered, it has been demonstrated that if this ramp had existed it would have had such a length and width as to be greater than that of the Pyramid itself. It has also been proven that in order to be able to transport these great masses pulled by ropes made from palm fibers, the ropes would have to have a thickness so large and a length so great that they would weigh almost as much as the rock, seeing as at that time they didn’t have either the plastic or the metal alloys that we have today. Furthermore, it can be deduced that the quantity of men needed to pull these masses would have been enormous; and since they had neither refrigerated trucks nor trains, nor boats, not aerial bridges, in order to feed these people, in order to sustain them, it would have required a greater multitude than Egypt had ever seen.

All these considerations continue to be kept quiet in the official chairs, or, in order to deal with them, they have become accustomed to attaching simplistic explanations to them.
Those phenomena that we have seen in archaeology will also be investigated in greater depth from other points of view as we approach the year 2000. And it is not because the phenomena has changed, what has changed is the vision of man, being able to explore different angles. If I wanted to know, for example, what is this small relief, I would not only have to look at it from the angle that I’m seeing it now, but also from the front, and from a different angle, from the top, from the bottom; I would have to detach it from the wall to see what it is made of, because just by looking at it, I won’t be able to find out if it’s made of bronze, of plastic or something else.
In that way, there will be an opening in Science towards a wider form of concepts. They will no longer consider things they do not know as “unscientific”, they will simply consider them unexplored. They will no longer make roundabout statements about the characteristics of man that have not as of yet been clearly defined. Science will apparently slow its progress, but it will be more like halting its dogmatizations, that is, making statements about things that have not been sufficiently tested. Science, in this apparent restraint, will open up, nonetheless, to new fields of man, of Nature and the relation between man and Nature, because we know that as we have distanced our lives from Nature, we have poisoned it.

People thought at first “Why should I care if Nature becomes polluted!”; but they did not realize that Nature is like a mirror and if we tarnish it, a time will come when our own image gets obscured or gets blurred. This means that the contamination that we have caused turns to our disadvantage and affects us biologically and psychologically. This is one of the points that we will be able to see more objectively as we gradually approach the year 2000.

There will also be a wider and more open investigation of religious problems. We will see that mankind, after the experimentation that began in the age of Enlightenment and the Cartesian experimentation, will little by little end up exhausting the experiments of a purely scientific-materialist type. Mankind has arrived at the realization that you cannot weigh or measure the soul; but in one way or another, we all know that the soul exists. Whether we believe in the immortality of the soul or not, whether we believe in a specific religious form or not, inside of every normal person, inside of every man, of every woman, especially if that person is young at heart, all feel that something exists beyond that which is simply material, we all feel that we have something inside ourselves that gives us an impulse and justifies us.

This interest, perhaps not for formal religions, bur certainly for mysticism, will also continue to develop. It is obvious that the current generation of young people have a greater interest in religious questions than the generation of young people of fifty or a hundred years ago. But that interest has to be properly channeled. It is logical that young people often tend to group together in a more or less disorganized manner, and so they begin to read books, and those books have a big influence over those who read them (the books with the greatest print run are generally the best sellers and are perhaps the most superficial) making many people feel that they guide them in their search. But the searching is there.

And we are certain that the cradles will be full of children who, more and more, will have need of this mystique, of a little solitude. Our great large cities, our megalopolis’ that we thought could arrive at a kind of image of paradise, in reality have become a reflection if not of a hell, then a kind of cemetery. The people, those who can, try to live outside of the big cities or if not, spend a few months of vacation outside of them, because in the big cities, on top of feeling alone, we feel crushed by the human mass.

Demographic growth, which is completely uncontrolled, and the methods to fight it, which we are unable to implement, force people to feel and perceive a sensation of being squeezed-in amongst the crowd of people. This is not some kind of theory, you know this. In the big cities, one only has to go out during one of the “rush” hours; where can I walk? Where can I park my car? And when I want to go in to drink a coffee, when I want to have lunch at a restaurant, I have to wait in line until others have finished before I can go in. And we all get the feeling, although we have money and live well, that we are in a kind of concentration camp where we have to be in line, one behind the other, waiting to get a bit of food.

And if we have to make a transaction in whatever government office, we clash against an enormous bureaucracy. In front of us, there is a mountain of people; behind us, there’s another mountain of people. When we arrive at the counter, they tell us “when your number is called, present yourself”. And we think to ourselves “ah! I no longer have a name, I’m no longer a man or a woman; now I’m a number”. And then someone shouts “number 75!” and someone answers back “that’s me!”

All of this mass alienation and numerical pressure is destroying our sense of individuality; but we have inside of us the capacity to react and to search for a New World and a Better World. The big cities will no longer be able to continue growing; the mega-cities; that are beginning to slow down, will perhaps be in recession in the year 2000. Mankind needs to return to living with Nature; and many are realizing that if you go on vacation or if you go to the country, but you bring a portable TV, a radio, a typewriter, or a tape deck, then it’s the same as not having gone at all. Mankind is beginning to perceive the beauty of his surroundings: jumping into clean water, being able to see the fish in a pond, watching the birds fly, etc. Today mankind needs a fresh return to Nature. He needs to clear himself away from the multitude, he needs a bit of solitude. This search for solitude must be contemplated by all those who wish to interpret the new currents of History that will take us to that year 2000.

Translated from lecture transcript